![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
Navigation |
Case Study: Airfoil
Both optical and CMM devices have been well-tested by airfoil manufacturers, but both are problematic on actual airfoil components. Hence, they require compromises. For example, optical scanners require sprays that add variable thickness (hence the incorrect surface is measured), may compromise the metallurgy or material properties. Thus, at the expense of speed, airfoil and engine component manufacturers have been compromising their inspection processes with either slower, manual CMMs, which deliver far less data, or with optical systems with their associated limitations. SolutionThe AFI 5000P was adopted to measure a shiny, polished airfoil surface, as well as to gather datum information on the blade edges and platform (or root). The figure above illustrates a representative (non-proprietary) airfoil. Â
The airfoil was placed in the AFI 5000P's field of view. The airfoil was rotated, the airfoil was scanned and the scans were merged together. ConclusionThe AFI 5000P met all requirements for a total airfoil inspection system capable of quickly verifying dimensions in a rapid manufacturing environment. Because the AFI 5000P can measure small aircraft and APU airfoils, as well as large power plant components, it represents the "total solution" that airfoil manufacturers are looking for. The AFI 5000P was the only system that met all customer requirements by delivering:
|
||||||||
![]() |
© 2007 Dimensional Photonics International, Inc. - Terms of Use Agreement - Glossary |